The LIEberals* are at it again and this time, they're demonstrating peacefully...
"National Guardsman Brutally Attacked In Pierce County
POSTED: 4:33 pm PDT August 30, 2006
UPDATED: 6:15 pm PDT August 30, 2006
PARKLAND, Wash. -- The Pierce County Sheriff's Department is searching for five people who allegedly attacked a uniformed National Guardsmen walking along 138th Street in Parkland Tuesday afternoon.
The soldier was walking to a convenience store when a sport utility vehicle pulled up alongside him and the driver asked if he was in the military and if he had been in any action.
The driver then got out of the vehicle, displayed a gun and shouted insults at the victim. Four other suspects exited the vehicle and knocked the soldier down, punching and kicking him.
"And during the assault the suspects called him a baby killer. At that point they got into the car and drove off and left him on the side of the road," Detective Ed Troyer with the Pierce County Sheriff's Department told KIRO 7 Eyewitness News.
The suspects were driving a black Chevy Suburban-type SUV.
"This is something new for us, we have not had military people assaulted because they were in the military or somebody's opposition to a war or whatever," Troyer said.
The driver is described as a white male, 25-30 years old, 5 feet 10 inches tall, heavy build, short blond hair, wearing a black T-shirt and jeans, and armed with a handgun.
The vehicle's passengers are described as white males, 20-25 years old. Some of the suspects wore red baseball hats and red sweatshirts during the attack.
The Pierce County Sheriff's Department is offering a $1,000 reward for information leading to the arrest and charging of the individuals involved. Informants can call 253-591-5959, and callers will remain anonymous. "
I can safely say that if I met the man who did this, he wouldn't be able to walk again. No one should ever assault, verbally or physically, a military person.
The term LIEberal is owned by ABFreedom and I'm using it without his permission.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
10 comments:
Ummm...maybe not.
"Authorities are continuing to investigate a National Guardsman's claim that he was attacked earlier this week in Parkland and called "a baby killer."
A witness who came forward after the incident told KIRO 7 Eyewitness News a different story about what happened on Tuesday morning, but deputies said the witness later changed that story when they interviewed him.
The witness told police he saw several men in uniform beat a man in civilian clothes, but later changed his account to back the guardsman.
Investigators said the witness's stories were inconsistent with the guardsman's, and they are back to "square one" in the investigation."
Now that's just disgusting ...I'm with you on any physical or verbal assault. It wouldn't be a pretty picture for these psycho *cough* peace-nicks ...
P.S. I don't own the term, and it's available for all to use. It's a general purpose universal word that has been developed to be a more accurate description of the lefts ideology. The constant bombardment of untruths, exaggeration, and appeasement in an attempt to win converts, and the unique ability to do absolutely nothing after they have achieved power. The UN, Fwance, Canadian LIEberals, and Democrates are all excellent examples of groups who have earned it's distinct usage.
Gotta love the liberal peacnick hyppocrites. They can always be counted on to expose the lie behind their own mask.
BTW, I'm back.
With witnesses like that Mr. Tastic, they'd be better off without any!
I use the term "lieberal" all the time. I do believe I picked it up off of Ab's blog first, and thought he coined it too.
IF there's any truth to this story, then obviously those who did the attacking are not peaceniks but rather those, like you, who believe in the use of violence-as-solution. Don't be ridiculous and suggest otherwise.
Now IF the story is true, it may well be that they are LIBERAL violence-supporters instead of Conservative ones, but they are violence-supporters, nonetheless. Calling them "peaceniks" is simply a lie. They are in your tribe - at least in the use of violence - not mine.
IF the story is true.
Anony-
To begin, your statements hold no truths because your claims aren't supported.
For you Dan-
I've enjoyed your visits but this is by far your most stretching point. Constantly you claim points from the MSM, implying of their continued factuality with no consideration of the source but when someone defies your reality, you accuse the MSM.
This story has been reported and confirmed by a variety of sources but when it came to light, it was scrutinized for its political flavor.
Why can't you admit when something has happened? Why can't you defend the offenders? I would have been more satisfied if you siad 'hey, my friends were fed up with the BS and the took action... so what?!?"
Don't pull the standard liberal rhetoric with the name-calling and propaganda. By no means am I a 'violence-pusher.' I believe in a solution before violence and have never expressed otherwise. These neanderthals are not of my 'tribe' but of yours.
For you to say otherwise is truly a lie. Say what you will Daniel, these are your brethren.
You're assuming, I think, that I'm of the tribe of "Liberals Who Believe in Violence." I am not (as you probably know from reading me elsewhere, I consider myself as much conservative as I do liberal).
Perhaps it would be fair to say that they are not of your tribe in that they aren't "conservative," but WHATEVER they are, the are NOT peaceniks/pacifists/peacemakers. By definition in their actions, they are not that. THAT is where I was saying the Lie was being perpetrated.
To smear Peacemakers by saying that they're violent too, and it's evident by these folks actions, is to falsely imply something about peacemakers. We reject this sort of behavior out-of-hand, whether it is perpetrated by those who claim to be liberal or those who claim to be conservative.
And really, NC, me? Name-calling? This on the page that refers to "lieberals," "peacenik hypocrites," and "psycho peaceniks"?
What name did I call, pray tell? That I implied that these young men believed in violence-as-solution? Or that I implied that they were of your tribe? Okay, that could be conceivably construed as name-calling (just as I reject the association of these thugs with peacemakers). So let's agree that they are not conservatives, that they probably consider themselves liberal and that they DO believe in violence-as-solution.
No names there, just the facts. I suspect you, being reasonable, may agree to this, but I doubt your comrades will...
Yes, I do call names and you know that. I'm also quite sarcastic.
All I have to say is that if the story is false, then some witnesses are REALLY bored and want to start a rumor.
As I assume the story is true, be them liberals, conservatives, progressives, that are pathetic for their actions.
They're neither of my tribe nor yours.
Very fair of you, thanks.
Post a Comment